Is Article 2 Regulatory or Facilitatory? A Socratic Dialogue
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary: Coda--a Socratic dialogue: Plato.
Epimenides Where do you come from, Socrates, and where are you going? Socrates Actually, it was you I was looking for in the marketplace. I just met with Theodorus and Alcibiades and we had a discussion that was well worth hearing about the interesting letter of the noble Charles Poole. Epimenides What do you think of the present debate, Socrates? Socrates Good heavens, I fancy you will never l...
متن کاملPictorial Socratic Dialogue and Conceptual Change
Counter-examples used in a Socratic dialogue aim to provoke reflection to effect conceptual changes. However, natural language forms of Socratic dialogues have their limitations. To address this problem, we propose an alternative form of Socratic dialogue called the pictorial Socratic dialogue. A Spring Balance System has been designed to provide a platform for the investigation of the effects ...
متن کاملDefining futile life-prolonging treatments through Neo-Socratic Dialogue
BACKGROUND In Japan, people are negative towards life-prolonging treatments. Laws that regulate withholding or discontinuing life-prolonging treatments and advance directives do not exist. Physicians, however, view discontinuing life-prolonging treatments negatively due to fears of police investigations. Although ministerial guidelines were announced regarding the decision process for end-of-li...
متن کاملProducing or reproducing reasoning? Socratic dialog is very effective, but only for a few
Successful communication between a teacher and a student is at the core of pedagogy. A well known example of a pedagogical dialog is 'Meno', a socratic lesson of geometry in which a student learns (or 'discovers') how to double the area of a given square 'in essence, a demonstration of Pythagoras' theorem. In previous studies we found that after engaging in the dialog participants can be divide...
متن کاملIs it a Monologue, a Dialogue or a turn in a Dialogue?
The various approaches prevalent in argumentation theory take as their fundamental unit of analysis the concept of ‘an argument’. It is generally assumed that any unit of argument is inherently dialectical: Eemeren and Grootendorst (1992), for example, use the notion of an “implicit discussion”. It has recently been recognised, however, that there may be important differences between arguments ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1952930